Reading Lolita in Tehran: a Memoir in Books
by Azar Nafisi ISBN: 081297106X
Post Your Opinion | | A Review of: Reading Lolita In Tehran by Gordon PhinnAbout twenty years ago, not long before he slipped into the editor's
chair at Books in Canada, then contributor Paul Stuewe journeyed
west from Toronto to Ontario's Huron County to uncover the outrage
behind the headlines: the ideologues of censorship had once again
been awakened from their routines and were pressuring local school
boards to remove certain books from the shelves of school libraries.
Margaret Lawrence's The Diviners was among them. Local worthies
bandied about words like blasphemous with monotonous regularity.
Decadent modern books were blamed for the rise in the rates of
teenage pregnancy and gonorrhea infection. Big city sophisticates
shuddered: Well, we rationalised, at least they can't get their
hands on the bookstores and public libraries.
While Iran after Khomeni was undoubtedly an infinitely more repressive
and dangerous society than small-town Ontario beset by squabbles,
it is sobering to hear similar accusations hurled at modern novels
by Farsi-speaking fanatics determined to condemn and lay blame.
Azar Nafisi, now a professor at John Hopkins, certainly evokes the
post-revolutionary hysteria that gripped Tehran with the calm
precision which comes from years of outrage and bitter retrospect.
As a card-carrying member of the educated, liberalised upper crust
that perhaps lost the most to the marauding mullahs of righteousness,
she most certainly has old scores to settle-an uncomfortable fact
often overlooked by western commentators keen to co-opt the most
useful elements in her memoir to their own Big-Brother-strikes-again
agendas.
Though Nafisi can speak eloquently of how reading is actually
"inhaling experience" and empathy being "the heart
of the novel," and charm our western literary hearts with her
repeated insightful disquisitions on Vladimir Nabokov, she can also
feed the heart of darkness when she describes the torture and death
of a general under the Shah who had conspired against her father,
a former mayor of Tehran. Perhaps the atmosphere of blood lust and
repression is best conveyed in her descriptions of funeral processions:
"That was the first time I experienced the desperate, orgiastic
pleasure of this form of public mourning: it was the one place where
people mingled and touched bodies and shared emotions without
restraint or guilt. There was wild, sexually flavoured frenzy in
the air."
Finally banned from teaching at the university for refusing to wear
the veil, she invites a few of her prize students to her home to
continue discussions in secret of those decadent western novelists
our chattering classes take for granted, Nabokov and Fitzgerald.
Even the seemingly innocuous, such as Jane Austen and Henry James,
have to be smuggled in under wraps. Nafisi's fond memories of her
hand-picked protgs, and their daily trials and triumphs over family
and state, are pitched against her nightmarish recall of the
predatoriness of post-revolutionary Tehran, where life was indeed
cheap and women even cheaper. Gruesome anecdotes abound, generally
of the men-run-amok-with-power variety.
Like all rituals enacted under prohibition, the success of their
clandestine book clubbing seems ever more delectable in retrospect,
the oligarchy of terror trumped one more time. Even their gossip,
naive and salacious by turns, of which many examples are carefully
exhumed and framed, seems eminently subversive in the atmosphere
of state approved behaviour. As Yassi, one of Nafisi's students
declares, "It is a truth universally acknowledged that a muslim
man, regardless of his fortune, must be in want of a nine-year-old
virgin wife."
Whether Nifisi's trotting out of the customary grim horrors of
fundamentalist repression and cruel retribution serves any greater
purpose than propping up the tired propaganda of western secularism
remains a moot point for this reviewer. Smug condescension to the
barbarous behaviour of others is all too easy when we have become
habituated to our own. Certainly, the stoning of adulterers and the
whipping of flesh-exposing women seems reprehensible in the extreme,
but how does our gun-toting, drug-running, profit-mad laissez-faire
science-obsessed culture seem to them?
For that perspective, return to Canadian Alison Wearing's late 90s
trek through Iran with her fake husband Ian, Honeymoon In Purdah,
as comic a rendering of this ancient civilisation come to grief as
Nifisi's is solemn. Under the hejab, an almost anonymous Wearing
is treated to many an insightful gabfest with the locals, who, while
squishing her with hospitality, harangue about secret government
agendas and spies, movies which exaggerate and literature which
lies, specifically Betty Mamoody's Not Without My Daughter, which
easily wins the ribbon for most grievances. Worried women point to
teen pregnancies and abortions, drunken driving and drugs. Why are
girls obsessed with looking seductive? Apparently we "simply
do not see how atrocious" our own lives are. Of course we have
freedom, but at what cost? Are we all slaves arguing for our own
imprisonment? One watches the debate and winces...Such pictures
remind us that, despite the slew of withering details that would
doubtlessly be offered by any disputant, life in Iran has many
unsettling similarities to our own.
|