| A Review of: Old Toronto Houses by Greg GatenbyTo its disgrace, no other big city in Canada pays as little respect
to its history as Toronto. Where Montreal, for example, happily
honours its historical figures with street names, parks, and squares,
Toronto, in contrast, avoids naming streets after heroes, preferring
the addiction of naming its streets after yet more trees or after
the relatives of property developers. The politicians untroubled
by this amnesia clearly do not read books, for the city has been
blessed with many fine histories-and one of the best has just been
published: Old Toronto Houses. The text, by Tom Cruickshank, exudes
the confidence that comes from formidable research. He has chosen
to organize the chapters according to architectural styles and eras,
but, like Suarez, he is not an intimidating or sneering guide even
if you have forgotten the differences between the Second Empire and
the Queen Anne period. He explains the points of difference, and
then proceeds, clearly and elegantly, to highlight the material or
historic details of individual residences. The admirable writing
is overshadowed only by the stunning photos of John de Visser. This
renowned Canadian photographer has illustrated many books before,
but he surpasses all of his previous work with this volume. The
pictures are so well shot and so beautiful, they may even convince
those, who think trashing Toronto is a mark of sophistication, that
the city may be redeemable after all. Because most of the photos
are of Victorian buildings, the book's only weak point is that it
reminds us of how physically attractive Toronto must have been from
circa 1870 to 1910. John Cheever once told me that what stunned him
most about Toronto was the beauty of the sunlight here at dusk.
Many of de Visser's pictures are shot at either dawn or dusk, and
manage to convey the splendour of that singular light. That such
photos also manage brilliantly to complement the text is a measure
of de Visser's formidable skill.
|