| A Review of: Be Quiet by Linda MorraHollingsworth, an originally English-born author whose publication
credits include In Confidence (1994) and Smiling Under Water (1989),
turns her attention to the period of Carr's artistic life in France
in her new novel, Be Quiet. The novel moves back and forth in time,
from Carr's generation-including her possible encounter with Frances
Hodgkins, the New Zealand artist, when they apparently both painted
in Brittany in 1911-to that of the fictional character, Catherine
Van Duren. Van Duren is a contemporary artist who is considered to
be a "loose cannon" in the academic world and who is
retiring from teaching art at a local university. The novel thus
invites the reader to draw comparisons implicitly between Carr,
Hodgkins and Van Duren.
The conclusion Hollingsworth makes serves as a warning for the kind
of impediments the artist must face and overcome in order to succeed.
Eventually, Carr circumvented those impediments by either relinquishing
or neglecting all romantic, familial and work-related obligations
in order to focus on painting. She was thus able to further her
artistic career. Catherine, her contemporary foil in the novel,
makes such calamitous errors as marrying Roger, a failed, pseudo
anti-establishment artist; subsequently becoming pregnant with her
daughter, Kit, who is an irresponsible, reckless and childish
thirty-something adult; and retaining an untenured position at the
university in spite of the fact that "she [had] applied for
all the tenure track positions that had come up." Like Carr,
she was outspoken, "a thorn in everyone's side," even
though she "was the sole means of support for her family and
had everything to lose by stepping out of line." Although no
one within the academy doubts her "ability as an artist,"
Catherine's talents have been thwarted for years by her obligations
to her daughter and to her work as an instructor. That she paints
in a manner that is "freer, looser" when she temporarily
frees herself from these constraints is curtailed a second time
later in the novel, which concludes in the most cataclysmic terms.
If even the less astute reader fails to grasp Hollingsworth's
imperative that the artist must commit her life to her craft alone,
the quasi-apocalyptic ending underscores the message thrice.
|