| A Review of: Rupert Hart-Davis: Man Of Letters by Greg GatenbyAlthough Rupert Hart-Davis died less than five years ago, already
the noted biographer Philip Ziegler has produced a wonderfully
readable account of the man and his career. Part of Ziegler's
success is due to his own felicitous, often witty writing. But the
success is also due to the fact that the career of Hart-Davis spanned
most of the twentieth century and so his personal history in many
ways is a history of British publishing for the same period. After
a shaky start at Heinemann, where he befriended H.G. Wells and J.B.
Priestly among other eminent authors, Hart-Davis became an editor
at Jonathan Cape in 1933. Ziegler has wicked fun citing examples
of Mr. Cape's meanness with money. And "it would have been
expected that Cape's partner, Wren Howard, would at least affect
benevolence. He was, on the contrary, even more cheese-paring than
his chairman." Into this parsimonious house, Hart-Davis brought
his efforts to publish books based on their inherent worth rather
than their value in the current market. His stance was bound to
conflict early and often with Cape who, Ziegler notes, "felt
little affection for authors." The meat in this biography
comes when Hart-Davis starts his own house and struggles to survive
financially while earning the awe of his fellow publishers at the
recondite nature of his list. This account of a noble publisher's
career might have devolved, in lesser hands, into a tiresome account
of sales records and author disputes. But Ziegler effortlessly
keeps the reader interested both in the rise and fall of the house's
fortunes, and in the complicated love life of the eponymous hero.
What strikes the Canadian reader particularly is the similarity
between Hart-Davis's efforts and those of houses here such as Lester,
Orpen and Dennys-firms which strove to present magnificent writing
from around the planet in a culture which too often doesn't seem
to care about quality. The generous would describe their efforts
as pearls before swine. Rigid capitalists are bound to say Hart-Davis
and his ilk are merely quixotic and nave. Regardless, some of the
sales figures quoted by Ziegler are appalling, and it is a measure
of the tenacity of Hart-Davis that he kept the press alive for so
long. While Ziegler's writing is very good, and his account of the
house in particular and British publishing in general are immensely
informative, the biography is an odd duck in that, the more I read,
and the more the biographer was generous to his subject, the less
I came to like him. Some years ago, Joyce Carol Oates coined
"pathography" to describe those books where the biography
is written by someone who ends up hating his subject. Ziegler has
spawned the inverse-a life story where selfish and intolerable acts
in the subject's personal life are dismissed or rationalized with,
to me, shocking bigheartedness. That said, this biography is not
hagiography, and I recommend it warmly to anyone even vaguely
interested in fine writing or the business of books.
|